Plain-language explanations of hypnosis researchSources last checked
Hypnosis Evidence

What the research on hypnosis actually shows

Hypnosis for Hot Flashes: What the Evidence Shows

One of the few hypnosis applications with a large, well-designed trial and a positive result.

Hot flashes are among the most common and bothersome symptoms of menopause. For women who cannot or prefer not to use hormone therapy, non-hormonal alternatives are important. Hypnosis has an unusually strong evidence base here, anchored by a well-designed trial with physiological outcome measures.

The key trial

Elkins and colleagues randomized 187 postmenopausal women reporting at least seven hot flashes per day to five weekly sessions of clinical hypnosis or a structured attention control [2]. The control group received the same number of sessions with the same therapist, focusing on discussion of symptoms without hypnotic suggestion.

Results:

  • Hot flash frequency reduced by 74% in the hypnosis group vs 17% in the control group
  • Hot flash severity scores reduced similarly
  • The difference was confirmed by ambulatory physiological monitoring (skin conductance), not just self-report
  • The effect was maintained at 12-week follow-up

The physiological confirmation is important. Hot flash frequency can be influenced by expectations and reporting bias, but skin conductance provides an objective measure that is harder to fake.

Why this trial matters

This trial has several features that make it unusual in hypnosis research:

  • Adequate sample size for the primary outcome
  • Active comparison group that matched time, attention and therapist contact
  • Physiological outcome measurement alongside self-report
  • Clinically meaningful effect size — a 74% reduction is large

Most hypnosis trials lack one or more of these features. The hot flash evidence is one of the few areas where the positive result survives the scrutiny applied in Why Comparison Groups Matter.

Earlier work

The same research group published an earlier trial in breast cancer survivors, finding that five sessions of hypnosis reduced hot flashes by 68% compared with no treatment [1]. That trial had 60 participants and no active control, making it less informative. The later, larger trial addressed both limitations.

The broader context

A systematic review of non-hormonal treatments for vasomotor symptoms found that hypnosis was among the more promising approaches, though the evidence base was smaller than for some other options [4]. The North American Menopause Society’s position statement listed hypnosis as a recommended non-hormonal option, citing level I evidence [5].

This is a relatively rare endorsement for hypnosis in a clinical guideline, and it reflects the quality of the Elkins trial.

Limitations and open questions

Question Status
Does the effect last beyond 12 weeks? Not established
Does it work for all severities? Trial enrolled women with ≥7 hot flashes/day
Can audio recordings alone produce the same effect? Not tested against clinician-delivered sessions
Does hypnotizability predict response? Not adequately studied for this indication
Has the result been independently replicated? Not by a different research group

The last point is significant. The evidence comes primarily from one research group, and independent replication is an important step before confidence can be high. A 2024 overview of hypnosis meta-analyses noted the general need for independent replication across the field [6].

How it compares with other non-hormonal options

Hormone replacement therapy remains the most effective treatment for hot flashes. Among non-hormonal options, CBT, SSRIs/SNRIs and hypnosis all have some evidence. Hypnosis has the advantage of no pharmacological side effects but the disadvantage of requiring clinician time and training.

Whether hypnosis is more effective than CBT for hot flashes has not been tested in a direct comparison.

What this means in practice

Hypnosis for menopausal hot flashes has stronger evidence than most hypnosis applications. Women experiencing bothersome hot flashes who prefer a non-hormonal approach may benefit from clinical hypnosis, particularly if it is delivered by a trained practitioner following the protocol tested in the Elkins trial. The evidence does not support using audio recordings alone for this purpose, as the trial combined clinician sessions with home practice.

For how to evaluate the quality of this and other trials, see What Is a Randomized Controlled Trial?.

When to see a clinician first. Hot flashes and other menopausal symptoms should be discussed with your GP or gynecologist. Hormone replacement therapy is the most effective treatment and should be considered where appropriate. Non-hormonal options including hypnosis are an alternative, not a first-line replacement. Seek medical advice before starting any new treatment for menopausal symptoms.

Frequently asked questions

Does hypnosis help with hot flashes?

The best available trial found a large reduction in hot flash frequency and severity with five sessions of clinical hypnosis, confirmed by physiological monitoring. This is stronger evidence than exists for most hypnosis applications, though it comes primarily from one research group.

How does hypnosis for hot flashes compare with hormone therapy?

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has the strongest evidence for hot flash reduction. Hypnosis has not been directly compared with HRT in a trial. The hypnosis trial enrolled women who preferred not to use or could not use hormonal treatment.

How many sessions are needed?

The main trial used five weekly sessions of clinical hypnosis with daily home practice using an audio recording. Whether fewer sessions would work, or whether the effect persists long-term, has not been established.

Does self-hypnosis work for hot flashes?

The trial combined clinician-delivered sessions with daily self-hypnosis practice at home. The contribution of each component is not known.

Sources and further reading

  1. Elkins et al. — Randomized trial of a hypnosis intervention for treatment of hot flashes among breast cancer survivors

    Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008;26:5022–5026. 60 breast cancer survivors; five weekly sessions of hypnosis vs no treatment. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6389.

  2. Elkins et al. — Clinical hypnosis in the treatment of postmenopausal hot flashes: a randomized controlled trial

    Menopause, 2013;20:291–298. 187 postmenopausal women; five sessions of hypnosis vs structured attention control with physiological monitoring. DOI: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31826ce3ed.

  3. Elkins, Fisher and Johnson — Cognitive hypnotherapy for pain management in breast cancer survivorship

    International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 2010;58:473–488. Application of hypnosis framework to cancer survivors. DOI: 10.1080/00207144.2010.499434.

  4. Ayers, Cowan, Leventhal and Mann — A systematic review of the evidence for the treatment of vasomotor menopausal symptoms

    Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 2012;72:317–326. Overview of non-hormonal treatments including hypnosis. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.01.009.

  5. North American Menopause Society — Nonhormonal management of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms: 2015 position statement

    Menopause, 2015;22:1155–1174. Clinical recommendations for non-hormonal approaches. DOI: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000546.

  6. Rosendahl, Alldredge and Haddenhorst — Meta-analytic evidence on the efficacy of hypnosis for mental and somatic health issues: a 20-year perspective

    Frontiers in Psychology, 2023;14:1330238 (published January 2024). Overview of 49 meta-analyses. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1330238.

Sources checked October 16, 2026. This is an editorial summary, not a systematic review or individual advice.

Related articles

Long-Term Follow-Up in Hypnosis Trials

Why most hypnosis trials lack long-term follow-up, what the few studies with extended data show, and why this gap matters for clinical claims.