Can Everyone Be Hypnotized? What the Evidence Shows
A question with a clear empirical answer that is routinely ignored in marketing.
“Everyone can be hypnotized” is one of the most common claims in hypnosis marketing. The research evidence directly contradicts it.
What the data show
Hypnotizability, as measured by standardized scales, follows a roughly normal distribution [1]:
- About 10–15% of the population are highly hypnotizable — they respond readily to a wide range of suggestions, including more challenging ones like hallucinations and amnesia
- About 60–75% are moderately hypnotizable — they respond to easier suggestions like arm levitation and eye closure but not to more difficult items
- About 10–15% are low in hypnotizability — they respond minimally or not at all, even to easy suggestions
This distribution has been replicated across cultures, age groups and settings. It is one of the most robust findings in hypnosis research.
Stability over time
Hypnotizability is remarkably stable. A landmark study retested participants after 25 years and found a test-retest correlation of 0.71 [2]. This is comparable to the stability of major personality traits over the same period.
This stability has important implications:
- Practice does not reliably increase hypnotizability. While some studies have shown modest increases with specific training [4], the gains are small and their clinical significance is unclear.
- Rapport with the hypnotist does not fundamentally change hypnotizability. A good therapeutic relationship may help someone relax and engage, but it does not move someone from the low range to the high range.
- Motivation matters less than people expect. Being highly motivated to be hypnotized does not overcome low trait hypnotizability.
For more detail on how these scales work, see What Is Hypnotizability?.
What “low hypnotizability” means
A person who scores low on hypnotizability scales is not being resistant or uncooperative. They are simply not responding to the specific types of suggestion that define the hypnotic domain. They can still:
- Relax during a hypnosis session
- Focus attention on the hypnotist’s words
- Imagine suggested scenarios
- Benefit from the non-hypnotic components of a session, such as therapeutic attention and relaxation
What they typically cannot do is experience the subjective alterations that characterize hypnotic responding: the sense that their arm is rising by itself, that they cannot open their eyes, or that a suggested image seems real.
Does hypnotizability predict clinical outcomes?
This is the critical question. If hypnotizability does not predict who benefits from clinical hypnosis, then the distribution matters less. The evidence is mixed:
| Application | Does hypnotizability predict outcome? |
|---|---|
| Laboratory pain | Yes — consistently |
| Chronic pain | Inconsistently |
| Surgical anxiety | Limited data |
| IBS | Not clearly |
| Hot flashes | Not adequately tested |
| Smoking cessation | Not clearly |
The pattern suggests that hypnotizability matters more for applications where the proposed mechanism is direct suggestion, and less where hypnosis is bundled with other therapeutic elements.
Why the marketing claim persists
The claim that “everyone can be hypnotized” persists for several reasons:
- Commercial incentive. Telling potential clients they might not respond is bad for business.
- Broadened definitions. If “hypnosis” is redefined to include relaxation and focused attention, then most people can experience something. But this empties the term of its distinctive meaning.
- Clinical experience. Therapists see patients improve in sessions labeled “hypnosis” even when hypnotizability is moderate, because the sessions include many non-hypnotic elements.
None of these reasons makes the claim accurate.
What this means in practice
Not everyone can be hypnotized in the research sense of the term. About one in seven people will respond minimally to hypnotic suggestion regardless of the skill of the practitioner, their own motivation or the number of sessions. People considering clinical hypnosis should know this, and practitioners should be honest about it. A person who does not respond to hypnotic suggestion is not failing; they are in the normal range of human variation.
For how hypnotizability is measured, see The Stanford and Harvard Hypnotizability Scales.
When to see a clinician first. If you are seeking hypnosis for a medical or psychological condition, discuss it with your doctor or therapist first. If you find that you do not respond to hypnotic suggestion, this does not mean your condition is untreatable — it means a different approach may be more appropriate. Evidence-based treatments exist for most conditions where hypnosis is offered.
Frequently asked questions
Can everyone be hypnotized?
No. About 10–15% of people score very low on standardized hypnotizability scales and respond minimally to hypnotic suggestion. Most people are moderately hypnotizable. About 10–15% are highly hypnotizable.
Can you increase your hypnotizability?
There is limited evidence that specific training programs can modestly increase responsiveness, but hypnotizability is largely stable over time. Motivation and practice do not appear to produce large changes.
Does it matter if you're not very hypnotizable?
For applications where hypnotic suggestion is the active ingredient, probably yes. For applications where hypnosis is bundled with relaxation, psychoeducation and therapeutic attention, the specific contribution of suggestibility may matter less.
Why do some hypnotists claim everyone can be hypnotized?
This is often a marketing claim. It may also reflect a broader definition of hypnosis that includes relaxation and focused attention, which most people can experience to some degree. By the research definition, which requires responding to specific suggestions, it is not accurate.
Sources and further reading
- Hilgard — Hypnotic Susceptibility
Harcourt, Brace & World, 1965. Foundational work on the distribution of hypnotizability using the Stanford scales.
- Piccione, Hilgard and Zimbardo — On the degree of stability of measured hypnotizability over a 25-year period
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989;56:289–295. Test-retest stability over 25 years. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.289.
- Woody and Barnier — Hypnosis scales for the twenty-first century: what do we need and how should we use them?
Oxford Handbook of Hypnosis, 2008:255–281. Review of hypnotizability measurement. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198570097.013.0010.
- Gorassini and Spanos — A social-cognitive skills approach to the successful modification of hypnotic susceptibility
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986;50:1004–1012. Training study attempting to modify hypnotizability. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.1004.
- Elkins, Barabasz, Council and Spiegel — Advancing research and practice: the revised Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 2015;63:1–14. Discussion of modern hypnotizability assessment. DOI: 10.1080/00207144.2014.961870.
Sources checked October 16, 2026. This is an editorial summary, not a systematic review or individual advice.